Specialty News

July 2010 Archive

New Publication Explores All Levels of IPD

Thursday, July 29, 2010

AGC of America, together with the National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA), Construction Owners Association of America (COAA), APPA: The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers, and the American Institute of Architects (AIA), just released Integrated Project Delivery for Public and Private Owners.

Integrated Project Delivery for Public and Private Owners explores the varying degrees of collaboration found in IPD, defining it as a philosophy and as a delivery method.  The publication explores why owners should consider adopting IPD principles, how IPD fits in to related industry trends, such as BIM and Lean, and offers suggestions on how to integrate IPD principles into construction projects.  Owners, general contractors and all project stakeholders will find Integrated Project Delivery for Public and Private Owners to be a useful resource regarding IPD. 

This publication is available for free at www.agc.org/projectdelivery or by clicking here.

SCC Executive Committee Meets in Utah

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

The AGC Specialty Contractors Council Executive Committee (SCC EC) met June 10, 2010 at the AGC Building Contractors Conference in Midway, UT.  Topics included the current construction market, AGC's value to specialty contractors, and future SCC initiatives.  The SCC EC will meet via conference call this Fall and in person at the 2011 AGC Annual Convention in Las Vegas, NV.

New OSHA Enforcement Effort Began June 18

Friday, July 23, 2010

OSHA is now enforcing the Severe Violators Enforcement Program that it announced in April. The program focuses enforcement efforts on employers who willfully and repeatedly endanger workers by exposing them to serious hazards. The directive establishes procedures and enforcement actions for the severe violator program, including increased inspections, such as mandatory follow-up inspections of a workplace found in violation and inspections of other worksites of the same company where similar hazards or deficiencies may be present.

AGC is concerned that the administration's efforts to emphasize fines and penalties over collaboration and results will undermine successful partnerships between industry and government that helped cut the construction fatality rate in half between 1998 and 2008.

For more information, contact Kevin Cannon at (703) 837-5410 or cannonk@agc.org.

LAST CHANCE - FREE Webinar on the ConsensusDOCS Administrative Forms

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

July 22, 2010 | 2:00pm-3:30pm ET

There are still a few spots left for this FREE informative webinar.  ConsensusDOCS has dozens of administrative forms to help you whether your project is large or small.  Discover the advantages of using ConsensusDOCS forms to help you manage the day-to-day administration of your construction projects. 

Using the ConsensusDOCS 700 Series as a baseline for examples, you will learn how to use these administrative documents to manage your projects more efficiently starting with the ConsensusDOCS 705 Invitation to Bid/Sub-Bid Proposal all the way through to the 782 Certificate of Final Completion.  Documents to be reviewed include:

  • RFI's, Bidding and Qualifications Statements
  • Bond Forms
  • Materials Storage
  • Change Orders
  • Purchase and Payment Forms
  • Certificates of Completion

Register Today - FREE.

For more information, contact Megan McGarvey at (703) 837-5369 or mcgarveym@agc.org.

Groups Challenge EPA's New Construction Stormwater Rules

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

EPA recently finalized its new stormwater rules that will impact nearly every construction and development project in the United States. The so-called Construction and Development Effluent Limitations Guidelines (C&D ELG) rule for the first time imposes an enforceable numeric limit on stormwater discharges from sites disturbing 10 acres or more at one time, requires monitoring to ensure compliance with the numeric limit, and requires nearly all construction sites to implement a range of prescriptive erosion and sediment controls and pollution prevention measures. Both the homebuilding industry and the U.S. Small Business Administration have taken legal action to challenge EPA's C&D ELG rule and, in particular, its numeric turbidity standard that dictates how murky stormwater can be when it runs off regulated construction sites. 

The new C&D ELG requirements, published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2009, will directly apply to a construction site "operator" when they are incorporated into an individual or general NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) stormwater permit that applies to his/her project(s). Construction stormwater permits are good for five years.  States are required by EPA to incorporate the new ELG requirements into their permits upon next reissuance.  For detailed information on the ELG rule and a list of state permit expiration dates, click here for an AGC article. 

Click here to find out more about the challenges brought against EPA's national stormwater rules.

For more information, please contact Leah Pilconis at (703) 837-5332 or pilconisl@agc.org.

EPA's New Layer of Lead-Based Paint Rules

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

EPA's Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (RRP) rule was fully implemented on April 22, 2010.  Under the current rules, contractors who perform renovations, repairs and/or painting projects in most pre-1978 housing, child-care facilities and schools (i.e., that have, or are assumed to have, lead-based paint) must comply with federal accreditation, training, certification, and recordkeeping requirements, or risk fines of up to $37,500 per day per violation.  AGC has distributed news articles that explain the legal requirements and contractor responsibilities - click here.

Note: EPA can authorize states to administer and enforce their own RRP programs. Several states have already done so (e.g., Kansas, Rhode Island, Utah, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Iowa and North Carolina), and several more have introduced legislation to take over the RRP rule.

Adding to the already complex regulatory regime, EPA has just taken three new actions that widen the rule's potential impact on the construction industry. 

1. Most notably, in an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR), EPA announced its intention to apply lead-safe work practices and other requirements to renovations on the exteriors of public and commercial buildings. The advance notice also announces EPA's investigation into whether lead-based paint hazards are created by interior renovation, repair and painting projects in public and commercial buildings. If EPA determines that lead-based paint hazards are created by interior renovations, EPA will propose regulations at a later date to address the hazards.

2. EPA also has eliminated the so-called "opt-out" provision.  (The RRP rule originally provided an exemption from the training and work requirements if the property owner certifies that no child under six and no pregnant woman resides in the subject premises.)  This final rule also requires renovation firms to provide a copy of the records demonstrating compliance with the training and work practice requirements of the RRP rule to the owner (and to the occupant of the building being renovated or the operator of the child-occupied facility, if different).

3. In addition, EPA made a separate rulemaking proposal that would require contractors to perform "dust-wipe testing" after most renovation, repair, and painting activities covered by the RRP rule to show that dust-lead levels comply with EPA's regulatory standards.  Regulated contractors would also need to provide the results of the testing to the owners and occupants of the building. For some of these renovations, the proposal would require that lead dust levels after the renovation be below the regulatory dust-lead hazard standards.

In related news, in response to an August 2009 petition submitted to EPA by the National Center for Healthy Housing, the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Sierra Club, EPA has agreed to issue a proposal to (1) modify the regulatory definition of "lead-based paint" and (2) lower the regulatory dust-lead hazard standards.  The Agency has not, however, committed to either a specific rulemaking outcome or a certain date for promulgation of a final rule.

To get the detailed story, please click here.